Tether just said its exposure to EQIBank was "limited"... after prosecutors seized $84M tied to a payments business allegedly moving hundreds of millions at that bank's direction. So here's the real question for the group chat. Is this nothing... just Tether holding assets at a bank that had a bad actor client, standard collateral damage, USDT keeps printing regardless. Or is this the first crack — the moment we look back on when USDT's banking relationships start getting picked apart one seizure at a time. I've got bags in this space and I'm not panicking, but I'm not pretending $84M seizures next to the word "Tether" are nothing either. Which side are you on — noise, or the start of something bigger?
⚡Kacy Harper⚡Share
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.